Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Can Therapy Affect the Immunological Response?

Background: A few studies on vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, and psoriatic arthropathy (PsA), demonstrated reduced production of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD (receptor-binding domain contained in the N-terminal of the S1 globular head region) when compared to the general population. Objective: The aim of our study was to observe whether different therapies for PsA [methotrexate, anti-TNF antibodies, soluble TNF receptor (etanercept) or IL-17 inhibitors] have a different impact on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a homogeneous population of patients. Methods: We enrolled 110 PsA patients in remission, assessed with Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA). Of these: 63 were in treatment with anti-TNF-α therapy (26 etanercept, 15 certolizumab, 5 golimumab, 17 adalimumab); 37 with anti-IL17 secukinumab; 10 with methotrexate. All patients underwent vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 with mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine. Assessment of absolute and percentage lymphocyte subsets and anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD IgG antibody value 3 weeks after the second vaccine dose were performed. In addition, the serum antibody levels of 96 healthy healthcare workers (HCW) were analyzed. Results: The mean disease activity assessed with DAPSA score was 2.96 (SD = 0.60) with no significant differences between patients under different medications (p = 0.779). Median levels of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD were 928.00 binding antibody unit (BAU)/mL [IQR 329.25, 1632.0]; 1068.00 BAU/ml [IQR 475.00, 1632.00] in patients taking MTX, 846.00 BAU/ml [IQR 125.00, 1632.00] in patients taking etanercept, 908.00 BAU/mL [IQR 396.00, 1632.00] in patients taking anti-IL17 and 1148.00 BAU/ml [IQR 327.00, 1632.00] in patients taking TNF-α inhibitors, without statistically significant differences between these groups. Mean serum antibody level of HCW group was 1562.00 BAU/ml [IQR 975.00, 1632.00], being significantly higher than in the patient group (p = 0.000816). Absolute and percentage count of lymphocyte subsets were not statistically different between the subgroups under different treatments and when compared with HCW. Conclusions: As for other rheumatic diseases on immunomodulatory treatment, our data showed a reduced humoral response in PsA patients compared to the control group. However, antibody response did not significantly differ between groups treated with different medications.

Booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines strengthens the specific immune response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective multicenter longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the kinetics of humoral and T-cell responses in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-patients followed up to 4-6 weeks (T3) after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster dose. METHODS: Health care workers (HCWs, n = 38) and patients with RA (n = 52) completing the messenger RNA vaccination schedule were enrolled at T3. In each cohort, 25 subjects were sampled after 5 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) from the first vaccine dose. The humoral response was assessed by measuring anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies, the T-cell response by interferon-γ-release assay (IGRA), T cell cytokine production, and B cell phenotype at T3 by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Patients with RA showed a significant reduction of antibody titers from T1 to T2 and a significant increase at T3. T-cell response by IGRA persisted over time in patients with RA, whereas it increased in HCWs. Most patients with RA scored positive for anti-RBD, neutralizing antibody and T-cell responses, although the magnitude was lower than HCWs. The spike-specific-cytokine response was mainly clusters of differentiation (CD)4+ T cells restricted in both cohorts and significantly lower with reduced interleukin-2 response and CD4-antigen-responding naïve T cells in patients with RA. Unswitched memory B cells were reduced in patients with RA compared with HCWs independently of vaccination. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine booster strengthens the humoral immunity in patients with RA even with a reduced cytokine response.

The Association of uPA, uPAR, and suPAR System with Inflammation and Joint Damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis: suPAR as a Biomarker in the Light of a Personalized Medicine Perspective.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the involvement of the soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) in the pathophysiological modulation of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) has been documented, resulting in the activation of several intracellular inflammatory pathways. METHODS: We investigated the correlation of urokinase Plasminogen Activator (uPA)/urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) expression and suPAR with inflammation and joint damage in RA, evaluating their potential role in a precision medicine context. RESULTS: Currently, suPAR has been shown to be a potential biomarker for the monitoring of Systemic Chronic Inflammation (SCI) and COVID-19. However, the effects due to suPAR interaction in immune cells are also involved in both RA onset and progression. To date, the literature data on suPAR in RA endorse its potential application as a biomarker of inflammation and subsequent joint damage. CONCLUSION: Available evidence about suPAR utility in the RA field is promising, and future research should further investigate its use in clinical practice, resulting in a big step forward for precision medicine. As it is elevated in different types of inflammation, suPAR could potentially work as an adjunctive tool for the screening of RA patients. In addition, a suPAR system has been shown to be involved in RA pathogenesis, so new data about the therapeutic response to Jak inhibitors can represent a possible way to develop further studies.

Assessing T-Cell Immunity in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Absent Antibody Production after a 3rd Dose of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine.

The vulnerable population of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are low responders to COVID-19 vaccines, so specific immune surveillance is needed. The interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) is effective in assessing T cell-mediated immunity. We assessed SARS-CoV-2-directed T cell responses in KTRs with absent antibody production after a third dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine, using two different IGRAs. A cohort of 57 KTRs, who were actively followed up, received a third dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. After the evaluation of humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2, 14 seronegative patients were tested with two commercial IGRAs (SD Biosensor and Euroimmun). Out of 14 patients, one and three samples were positive by IGRAs with Euroimmun and SD Biosensor, respectively. The overall agreement between the two assays was 85.7% (κ = 0.444). In addition, multivariate linear regression analysis showed no statistically significant association between the IFN-γ concentration, and the independent variables analyzed (age, gender, years since transplant, total lymphocytes cells/mcl, CD3+ cells/mcl, CD3+ CD4+ cells/mcl, CD3+ CD8+ cells/mcl, CD19+ cells/mcl, CD3-CD16+CD56+ cells/mcl) (p > 0.01). In a vulnerable setting, assessing cellular immune response to complement the humoral response may be advantageous. Since the two commercial IGRAs showed a good agreement on negative samples, the three discordant samples highlight the need for further investigations.

Soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) levels are predictive of COVID-19 severity: an Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: The soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) has been identified as a reliable marker of COVID-19 severity, helping in personalizing COVID-19 therapy. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between suPAR levels and COVID-19 severity, in relation to the traditional inflammatory markers. METHODS: Sera from 71 COVID-19 patients were tested for suPAR levels using Chorus suPAR assay (Diesse Diagnostica Senese SpA, Italy). suPAR levels were compared with other inflammatory markers: IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, circulating calprotectin, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, and Neutrophil/Lymphocytes Ratio (NLR). Respiratory failure, expressed as P/F ratio, and mortality rate were used as indicators of disease severity. RESULTS: A positive correlation of suPAR levels with IL-6 (r = 0.479, p = 0.000), TNF-α (r = 0.348, p = 0.003), circulating calprotectin (r = 0.369, p = 0.002), neutrophil counts (r = 0.447, p = 0.001), NLR (r = 0.492, p = 0.001) has been shown. Stratifying COVID-19 population by suPAR concentration above and below 6 ng/mL, we observed higher levels of circulating calprotectin (10.1 µg/mL, SD 7.9 versus 6.4 µg/mL, SD 7.5, p < 0.001), higher levels of P/F ratio (207.5 IQR 188.3 vs 312.0 IQR 127.8, p = 0.013) and higher mortality rate. Median levels of suPAR were increased in all COVID-19 patients requiring additional respiratory support (Nasal Cannula, Venturi Mask, BPAP and CPAP) (6.5 IQR = 4.9) compared to the group at room air (4.6 IQR = 4.2). CONCLUSION: suPAR levels correlate with disease severity and survival rate of COVID-19 patients, representing a promising prognostic biomarker for the risk assessment of the disease.

Immunogenicity to A Third Dose of the Mrna-1273 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND Humoral response after two doses of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is weak in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) [1]. Of concern, even a third dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine induced a suboptimal humoral response in a cohort of KTRs who did not respond after two doses [2]. However, the assessment also of the T-cell immune response of mRNA vaccines in KTRs is limited in the literature [3]. Herein, we report the evaluation of humoral response induced after a third dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in a cohort of KTRs and T-cell immune responses in not responders to the third dose. METHODS Observational cohort data were collected from KTRs actively followed up in our outpatient clinic, with no history of COVID-19 infection, who received a third mRNA-1273 vaccine dose, 6 months after the second dose, as per suggested local policy. The primary endpoint was the humoral response provided at least 4 weeks after the third dose compared with the humoral response after the second dose. Anti-S1-RBD IgG antibodies were determined using a fluoroimmunoenzymatic method (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the quantitative result expressed in BAU/mL (reference interval: <28 Negative;28–40 Borderline;>40 Positive;linear range between 0.7 and >1632 according to the manufacturer). In seronegative and borderline KTRs after the third dose, an INFγ-release assay (IGRA) [Euroimmun, Lubeck, Germany] was used to detect T-cell immune responses. A patient result was considered negative, borderline and positive when IFNγ values were respectively <100, 100–200 and >200 mIU/mL. RESULTS Sixty KTRs received a third dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Overall, we obtained the antibody titre in 57 KTRs at a median of 23 days (IQR: 22–31) after the second dose and 23 days (IQR: 21–26) after the third dose. After the second dose, positive antibody titres were detectable in 28 KTRs (49%), and 2 KTRs (4%) had a borderline positivity. While after third dose, positive and borderline antibody responses were observed in 40 (70%) and 4 (7%) KTRs, respectively. Among all 57 KTRs, the median anti-S1-RBD IgG titre significantly increased after the third dose ( 448 versus 39 BAU/mL;P = 0.0018;Mann–Whitney test). While in 28 KTRs already seropositive after the second dose, the median antibody titre increased from 556 to >1632 BAU/mL (P = 0.0285;Mann–Whitney test). Figure 1 shows the kinetics of anti-S1-RBD IgG titres after the second and the third dose for all the 57 KTRs. Among 17 KTRs with negative and borderline humoral responses after the third dose, IFNγ values were positive and borderline in only 1 (6%) and 1 (6%) KTRs, respectively. The median IFNγ value was 22 mIU/mL (IQR: 0–1014). The 34 KTRs receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were less likely to develop adequate immune responses than the 23 KTRs not receiving MMF;12 KTRs (35%) receiving MMF had no antibody and IFNγ positive response after the third dose in comparison to 4 KTRs (17%) not receiving MMF, and the median anti-S1-RBD IgG titre beyond the two groups after the third dose was statistically different (205 versus > 1632;P = 0.0046;Mann–Whitney test). CONCLUSIONS In this study, the third dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine increases the rate of positive antibody responses in non-responders KTRs after the second dose, and improves the magnitude of these responses in already seropositive KTRs. However, a fraction of KTRs still lacks protective antibody titres and T-cell responses after a third dose, with mycophenolate mofetil to be associated with poor immune responses. Alternative vaccination protocols are needed to protect this high-risk group.

Clinical utility of circulating calprotectin to assist prediction and monitoring of COVID-19 severity: An Italian study.

BACKGROUND: Calprotectin (S100A8/A9) has been identified as a biomarker that can aid in predicting the severity of disease in COVID-19 patients. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between levels of circulating calprotectin (cCP) and the severity of COVID-19. METHODS: Sera from 245 COVID-19 patients and 110 apparently healthy individuals were tested for calprotectin levels using a chemiluminescent immunoassay (Inova Diagnostics). Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and type of respiratory support administered were used as indicators of disease severity, and their correlation with calprotectin levels was assessed. RESULTS: Samples from patients in the ICU had a median calprotectin concentration of 11.6 µg/ml as compared to 3.5 µg/ml from COVID-19 patients who were not in the ICU. The median calprotectin concentration in a cohort of healthy individuals collected before the COVID-19 pandemic was 3.0 µg/ml (95% CI: 2.820-2.969 µg/ml). Patients requiring a Venturi mask, continuous positive airway pressure, or orotracheal intubation all had significantly higher values of calprotectin than controls, with the increase of cCP levels proportional to the increasing need of respiratory support. CONCLUSION: Calprotectin levels in serum correlate well with disease severity and represent a promising serological biomarker for the risk assessment of COVID-19 patients.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic diseases: doubts and perspectives.

Since January 2020, the whole world has been facing the worst epidemic for a century. SARS-CoV- 2 infection has so far caused more than one million deaths, with the only measures capable of containing the spread of the virus being social distancing, frequent hand washing, and the wearing of masks. Vaccine development was urgently needed and there are now more than 90 candidate vaccines being developed using different technologies. The European Medicines Agency has recently approved a second mRNA-based vaccine, but the introduction of vaccines has raised some doubts about patients with rheumatic disease, who are at high risk of infection because of disease activity and the therapies used to treat it. The aim of this study was to investigate how vaccines may interact with the immune system and treatment of such patients, and how to monitor the post-vaccine antibody titres and T cell responses in order to assess their efficacy and safety.

Role of booster with BNT162b2 mRNA in SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Only case reports and small clinical series report the effects of booster vaccination with BNT162b2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied 200 patients with RA in clinical remission evaluated with the DAS28. All patients were vaccinated for SARS CoV-2 with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The value of anti-SARS-CoV 2 Spike RBD IgG antibodies was determined at T1 (3 weeks after first vaccination) and T2 (3 weeks after booster). In addition, patients underwent assessment of lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry analysis before starting the vaccination cycle (T0). Furthermore, the serum antibody levels of 96 health care workers (HCWs) were analyzed for comparison. DAS28 values at T0, T1, and T2 indicated remission or low disease activity in all patients. Levels of anti-SARS CoV-2 IgG at T1 were higher in HCWs than in patients' groups: 1562.00 BAU WHO/mL [975.00-1632.00] vs 416.00 BAU WHO/mL [110.00, 1581.00], p <0.001. Anti-SARS COV2 IgG levels at T1 and at T2 were slightly lower in patients taking b/tsDMARDs than in patients under csDMARDs. Regression analysis evidenced age, treatment with abatacept (ABA), JAK inhibitors, and rituximab (RTX) as negative predictors of higher anti-SARS CoV-2 IgG levels at T1. Moreover, treatment with anti-IL6, anti-JAK, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) emerged as positive predictors of higher levels of anti-SARS CoV-2 IgG at T2. Our data show that despite the booster vaccine with BNT162b2, seroconversion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is influenced by the background therapy, particularly for patients being treated with ABA and RTX.

The role of neutralizing antibodies by sVNT after two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of Italian healthcare workers.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluating anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels is a current priority to drive immunization, as well as to predict when a vaccine booster dose may be required and for which priority groups. The aim of our study was to investigate the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 protein IgG (anti-S1 IgG) antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in an Italian cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs), following the Pfizer/BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, over a period of up to six months after the second dose. METHODS: We enrolled 57 HCWs, without clinical history of COVID-19 infection. Fluoroenzyme-immunoassay was used for the quantitative anti-S1 IgG antibodies at different time points T1 (one month), T3 (three months) and T6 (six months) following the second vaccine shot. Simultaneously, a commercial surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) was used for the determination of NAbs, expressed as inhibition percentage (% IH). RESULTS: Median values of anti-S1 IgG antibodies decreased from T1 (1,452 BAU/mL) to T6 (104 BAU/mL) with a percent variation of 92.8% while the sVNT showed a percent variation of 34.3% for the same time frame. The decline in anti-S1 IgG antibodies from T1 to T6 was not accompanied by a loss of the neutralizing capacity of antibodies. In fact at T6 a neutralization percentage <20% IH was observed only in 3.51% of HCWs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that the decrease of anti-S1 IgG levels do not correspond in parallel to a decrease of NAbs over time, which highlights the necessity of using both assays to assess vaccination effectiveness.

Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Can Therapy Affect the Immunological Response?

Background A few studies on vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, and psoriatic arthropathy (PsA), demonstrated reduced production of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD (receptor-binding domain contained in the N-terminal of the S1 globular head region) when compared to the general population. Objective The aim of our study was to observe whether different therapies for PsA [methotrexate, anti-TNF antibodies, soluble TNF receptor (etanercept) or IL-17 inhibitors] have a different impact on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a homogeneous population of patients. Methods We enrolled 110 PsA patients in remission, assessed with Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA). Of these: 63 were in treatment with anti-TNF-α therapy (26 etanercept, 15 certolizumab, 5 golimumab, 17 adalimumab);37 with anti-IL17 secukinumab;10 with methotrexate. All patients underwent vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 with mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine. Assessment of absolute and percentage lymphocyte subsets and anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD IgG antibody value 3 weeks after the second vaccine dose were performed. In addition, the serum antibody levels of 96 healthy healthcare workers (HCW) were analyzed. Results The mean disease activity assessed with DAPSA score was 2.96 (SD = 0.60) with no significant differences between patients under different medications (p = 0.779). Median levels of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD were 928.00 binding antibody unit (BAU)/mL [IQR 329.25, 1632.0];1068.00 BAU/ml [IQR 475.00, 1632.00] in patients taking MTX, 846.00 BAU/ml [IQR 125.00, 1632.00] in patients taking etanercept, 908.00 BAU/mL [IQR 396.00, 1632.00] in patients taking anti-IL17 and 1148.00 BAU/ml [IQR 327.00, 1632.00] in patients taking TNF-α inhibitors, without statistically significant differences between these groups. Mean serum antibody level of HCW group was 1562.00 BAU/ml [IQR 975.00, 1632.00], being significantly higher than in the patient group (p = 0.000816). Absolute and percentage count of lymphocyte subsets were not statistically different between the subgroups under different treatments and when compared with HCW. Conclusions As for other rheumatic diseases on immunomodulatory treatment, our data showed a reduced humoral response in PsA patients compared to the control group. However, antibody response did not significantly differ between groups treated with different medications.

Performance evaluation of four surrogate Virus Neutralization Tests (sVNTs) in comparison to the in vivo gold standard test.

BACKGROUND: Several commercial surrogate Virus Neutralization Tests (sVNTs) have been developed in the last year. Neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies through interaction with Spike protein Receptor Binding Domain (S-RBD) can block the virus from entering and infecting host cells. However, there is a lack of information about the functional activity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that may be associated with protective responses. For these reasons, to counteract viral infection, the conventional virus neutralization test (VNT) is still considered the gold standard. The aim of this study was to contribute more and detailed information about sVNTs' performance, by determining in vitro the anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody concentration using four different commercial assays and then comparing the obtained data to VNT. METHODS: Eighty-eight samples were tested using two chemiluminescence assays (Snibe and Mindray) and two ELISA assays (Euroimmun and Diesse). The antibody titers were subsequently detected and quantified by VNT. RESULTS: The overall agreement between each sVNT and VNT was 95.45% for Euroimmun and 98.86% for Diesse, Mindray and Snibe. Additionally, we investigated whether the sVNTs were closer to the gold standard than traditional anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays S-RBD or S1 based, finding a higher agreement mean value for sVNTs (98.01 ± 1.705% vs 95.45 ± 1.921%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, Spearman's statistical analysis for the correlation of sVNT versus VNT showed r = 0.666 for Mindray; r = 0.696 for Diesse; r = 0.779 for Mindray and r = 0.810 for Euroimmun. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed a good agreement between VNT and sVNTs. Despite the VNT still remains the gold standard, the sVNT might be a valuable tool for screening wider populations.

The WHO International Standard for COVID-19 serological tests: towards harmonization of anti-spike assays.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays are relevant in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, providing valuable data on the immunization status of the population. However, current serology tests are highly variable, due to their different characteristics and to the lack of reference materials. The aim of the World Health Organization (WHO) first International Standard (IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin is to harmonize humoral immune response assessment after natural infection or vaccination, and recommend reporting the results for binding activity in Binding Antibody Units (BAU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed six commercial quantitative anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-protein assays in a head-to-head comparison, using the manufacturers' conversion factors for the WHO IS to obtain BAU/mL values. RESULTS: Our data showed good alignment up to 1000 BAU/mL, then began to disperse, exhibiting some discrepancies. Moreover, correlations among methods varied with Cohen's Kappa ranging from 0.580 to 1.00, with the lowest agreement values for kits using different target antigens or different antibody isotypes, making it clear that the laboratory report should include this information. Values expressed as BAU/ml showed a reduced between-assays variability compared to AU/ml (median coefficients of variation 0.38 and 0.68, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these data at present anti-SARS CoV-2 serological assays' results are not interchangeable, and, more importantly, individual immune monitoring should be performed with the same method.

Assessment of humoral and cellular immunity induced by the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthcare workers, elderly people, and immunosuppressed patients with autoimmune disease.

The development of vaccines to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection has mainly relied on the induction of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) to the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, but there is growing evidence that T cell immune response can contribute to protection as well. In this study, an anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody assay and an INFγ-release assay (IGRA) were used to detect humoral and cellular responses to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine in three separate cohorts of COVID-19-naïve patients: 108 healthcare workers (HCWs), 15 elderly people, and 5 autoimmune patients treated with immunosuppressive agents. After the second dose of vaccine, the mean values of anti-RBD antibodies (Abs) and INFγ were 123.33 U/mL (range 27.55-464) and 1513 mIU/mL (range 145-2500) in HCWs and 210.7 U/mL (range 3-500) and 1167 mIU/mL (range 83-2500) in elderly people. No correlations between age and immune status were observed. On the contrary, a weak but significant positive correlation was found between INFγ and anti-RBD Abs values (rho = 0.354, p = 0.003). As to the autoimmune cohort, anti-RBD Abs were not detected in the two patients with absent peripheral CD19+B cells, despite high INFγ levels being observed in all 5 patients after vaccination. Even though the clinical relevance of T cell response has not yet been established as a correlate of vaccine-induced protection, IGRA testing has showed optimal sensitivity and specificity to define vaccine responders, even in patients lacking a cognate antibody response to the vaccine.

Closing the serological gap in the diagnostic testing for COVID-19: The value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA antibodies.

During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the early diagnosis of patients is a priority. Serological assays, in particular immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), have today several applications but the interpretation of their results remains an open challenge. Given the emerging role of the IgA isotype in the COVID-19 diagnostics, we aimed to identify the SARS-CoV-2 IgA antibodies in a COVID-19 population seronegative for IgM. A total of 30 patients hospitalized in San Giovanni di Dio Hospital (Florence, Italy) for COVID-19, seronegative for IgM antibodies, have been studied for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. They all had a positive oro/nasopharyngeal swab reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction result. Assays used were a chemiluminescent assay measuring SARS-CoV-2 specific IgM and IgG (S + N) and an ELISA, measuring specific IgG (S1) and IgA antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Among the 30 patients, eight were positive for IgA, seven were positive for IgG (N + S), and two for IgG (S1), at the first point (5-7 days from the onset of symptoms). The IgA antibodies mean values at the second (9-13 days) and third (21-25 days) time points were even more than twice as high as IgG assays. The agreement between the two IgG assays was moderate (Cohen's K = 0.59; SE = 0.13). The inclusion of the IgA antibodies determination among serological tests of the COVID-19 diagnostic is recommended. IgA antibodies may help to close the serological gap of the COVID-19. Variations among anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays should be considered in the interpretation of results.